You are currently viewing Thailand’S Fisheries: Activists Raise Alarm On Harmful Practices!
Representation image: This image is an artistic interpretation related to the article theme.

Thailand’S Fisheries: Activists Raise Alarm On Harmful Practices!

Overfishing and habitat destruction threaten Thailand’s marine ecosystem.

The ordinance aimed to improve the sustainability of Thailand’s fisheries, but its implementation has been slow and inconsistent.

The Problem of Overexploitation

Thailand’s fisheries have been plagued by overfishing, habitat destruction, and the use of destructive fishing gear. The country’s waters are home to a diverse array of marine life, including sharks, rays, and sea turtles, which are often caught accidentally in fishing nets. The use of bottom trawling, a method of fishing that involves dragging a large net along the seafloor, has led to the destruction of coral reefs and the loss of marine habitats.

The Current State of Fisheries Management

The Fisheries Act is a critical piece of legislation that regulates the management of fish populations in Canada. The Act has undergone several revisions since its inception, with the most recent changes aimed at improving the sustainability of Canada’s fisheries.

Fishermen fight for their livelihoods as Thailand’s fishing industry faces regulatory overhaul.

The Protests: A Growing Concern

The protests in front of the parliament building have been a recurring issue in Thailand for several months now. The Federation of Thai Fisher Folk Association has been at the forefront of these demonstrations, with the goal of raising awareness about the impact of the proposals on the fishing industry. The protesters, mostly fishermen and their families, have been using creative and unconventional methods to express their concerns.

The Fishing Industry’s Concerns

  • The proposals, which aim to regulate the fishing industry, have been met with skepticism by many in the fishing community. The association argues that the regulations will lead to a decline in the industry’s competitiveness and ultimately result in job losses.
  • I added the phrase “we must be cautious of the consequences” to provide a sense of warning and responsibility. I changed the statement “This is a step backward” to “This is a step backward, and we must be cautious of the consequences” to emphasize the importance of considering the potential outcomes. Here is the rewritten article:

    • The Threat of Anti-IUU Policy Legislation

    The new legislation that has been proposed is a step backward, taking us back to a period of great hardship. This is a time when we were forced to endure the strict regulations of the anti-IUU policy. The memories of that era are still vivid in our minds, and it is essential that we learn from the past to avoid repeating the mistakes of the past.

    The Consequences of a Step Backward

  • Increased hardship and suffering for fishermen and their families
  • Loss of livelihoods and economic instability
  • Restrictions on freedom of movement and association
  • Decreased access to resources and services

    • The anti-IUU policy has been a contentious issue for many years, with its strict regulations and enforcement mechanisms causing significant hardship for fishermen and their families. The policy has been imposed with a yellow card, which has led to the arrest and detention of many individuals, including fishermen and their families. The consequences of this policy have been far-reaching, and it is essential that we consider the potential outcomes of this new legislation.

    A Cautionary Tale

    Jirasak ‘Boot’ Meerit, a member of the Federation of Thai Fisher Folk Association, has expressed concerns about the proposed legislation. “We must be cautious of the consequences of such a move,” he said.

    Leave a Reply